Home
CA Water News
Water Laws
San Joaquin River
Public Responses
Board of Directors
Mission & History
Videos
Donors List
Donate
Public Relations
Newsletter
Search Our Site
About Us
Contact Us


Jul 03, 2015
California Is Becoming a Dust Bowl
Here are several columns by Victor Davis Hanson that make good reading for your July 4th weekend. ... more

Jul 01, 2015
100% Attention on a 3% Problem
We're all running around 'drought shaming' each other, getting mad at farmers, and generally worrying about the wrong things. ... more

Jun 25, 2015
FPV Taking Part in Two Drought Discussions
Families Protecting the Valley Board Member Kole Upton and Executive Director John Broeske will take part in two different drought discussions today and tomorrow in Fresno. ... more
Recent California Water News

Farm Bill 'Reform' Stuffed With Pork

Jun 10, 2012

San Francisco Chronicle

Every once in a while, Democrats and Republicans can work together. Witness Thursday's 90-8 vote to bring a "bipartisan reform" farm bill before the Senate. In the expectation that the bill will garner the necessary 60 votes, the House Agriculture Committee has changed its schedule to allow a floor debate on the measure in July. The White House applauded. This is Washington's version of the dawning of the Age of Aquarius.

There's just one little problem. Somehow, whenever the two parties work together, they end up spending a lot of other people's money. The Agriculture Reform, Food, and Jobs Act of 2012, co-authored by Sens. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., and Pat Roberts, R-Kan., is a 10-year, $1 trillion package.

Stabenow boasts that her bill would produce $23.6 billion in savings from what Washington would spend under current law. "We examined every agriculture program to see what was working and what wasn't," said she. That's all she could squeeze out of a $969 billion package? President Obama proposed shaving $32 billion from that pot. The GOP House budget calls for a reduction of almost $180 billion over 10 years.

Stabenow does have one accomplishment over which she is free to crow, and she has: "The era of direct payments is over. We're not going to be paying farmers for crops they don't grow." The end of the direct-payments program should save taxpayers about $5 billion annually.

Alas, noted Citizens Against Government Waste spokeswoman Leslie Paige, "It's like a Whac-A-Mole game with these programs." Goodbye, direct payments. Hello, new crop insurance subsidy.

As the New York Times reported, the government already spends $7 billion to pay two-thirds of farmers' crop insurance. The new farm bill creates an additional $3 billion annual subsidy to further pad the cost of risk insurance.

"They're using 75 percent of the savings that they get from cutting traditional farm subsidies to create yet another kind of farm subsidy that guarantees income for farmers," Environmental Working Group Vice President Craig Cox complained. His group supports subsidies for farmers' "deep" losses. Cox favors what "most people would consider a safety net." But he said that "what's being proposed is more like what most people would consider a security blanket."

Advocates on the right and left have joined to fight the bill. Liberal groups want to redirect the money that subsidizes big agriculture toward nutrition programs and environmental protection.

Fiscal hawks don't like the big spending. "We don't want to reprogram any of it," said Paige. "We want it all to go to the debt and deficit reduction."

Both sides can agree that it doesn't make sense for the federal government to throw so much money at big agriculture that farmers have an incentive to engage in over-planting - which might encroach on wildlife - as government programs reduce the risk of planting on marginal land.

"A real reform bill would have ended direct payments, rejected new farm entitlements and made important reforms to crop insurance subsidies that are slated to cost $90 billion over the next 10 years," Cox said in a statement.

While Stabenow and company have been patting themselves on the back for ferreting out wasteful spending, the Congressional Budget Office reported that her farm bill would "make popcorn an eligible crop for program benefits."

Popcorn? As Paige explained it, there's a way you can tell this so-called reform is a weasel. "You can tell," she said, "because no one's screaming."

 

What's in the farm bill

The bill, which is revised every five years, is expected to cost about $969 billion over the next decade but cuts current spending by $23 billion. It would:

-- Eliminate direct payments from the government to farmers regardless of whether they plant a crop. The payments program now costs about $5 billion a year.

-- Make an expanded crop insurance program the primary safety net for farmers. To replace direct payments, the bill would create a crop insurance subsidy, at a cost of $3 billion a year, to cover losses farmers suffer before their crop insurance policies kick in.

-- Cut $4.5 billion from food-stamp programs.

Source: New York Times

Debra J. Saunders is a San Francisco Chronicle columnist. E-mail: dsaunders@sfchronicle.com

Join Our Mailing List


Jul 03, 2015
Farmers Efficient With Water
Estimates of the amount of water that could be conserved...were calculated...by researchers at the Center for Irrigation Technology in CSU Fresno at 1.3 percent ... more

Jun 29, 2015
More Nut Trees!
I see acres of lush green lawns on the property of local almond barons in addition to their young, green almond trees. ... more

Jun 09, 2015
Seizing Land
Farms are being cut in half, property taken at below value in many locations across the state. ... more

Jun 09, 2015
HSR VS Hop a Plane
Uhhh...this is a boondoggle deluxe and a complete waste of taxpayer money. ... more

Jun 09, 2015
HSR 1980's Technology
Really, it's a stupid idea that should be scrapped. ... more

Jun 06, 2015
Fantasy Train Derailed?
But what happens when they get into dense urban areas like the LA basin?…or even worse the Bay area, the land of uber nimbyism? ... more

Jun 02, 2015
Fighting Among Ourselves
It seems we've only had projects that reduce water supply like removing dams and sending more fresh water into the ocean. ... more

Jun 01, 2015
1914 Rights
If we're going to look at water rights, let's get it over with. ... more

Jun 01, 2015
Little Substance?
Once you get past the idyllic memories of her past you are left with little of substance. ... more
Copyright © 2006 -   Families Protecting The Valley, All Rights Reserved.
Web Design & Hosting by Netricks